Hillary Clinton 88% Probability of Popular Vote Victory

Prediction Made: 2014-06 Year Predicted: 2016

Before the 2016 U.S. presidential election, Bashar predicted that Hillary Clinton had an 88% probability of victory. In the November 2016 election, Donald Trump won the Electoral College and the presidency. However, in the September 23, 2017 'Eclipse' session, Bashar clarified that the 88% probability specifically referred to Hillary Clinton winning the popular vote — which she did, by approximately 2.9 million votes (48.2% to 46.1%). The Electoral College outcome (Trump winning the presidency) was explained as a shift to a different parallel timeline. This prediction demonstrates Bashar's framework: predictions reflect energy at the moment they are made, and outcomes can shift based on collective and individual choices.

Probability

88%

Based on sensing the collective consciousness energy at the time the prediction was made. Bashar emphasized predictions are probabilities, not certainties, and can be altered by free will.

Evidence

In the November 8, 2016 U.S. presidential election, Hillary Clinton won the national popular vote by approximately 2.9 million votes (48.2% to 46.1%), while Donald Trump won the Electoral College with 304 votes to Clinton's 227. In the September 23, 2017 'Eclipse' session, Bashar clarified that the 88% probability referred specifically to the popular vote outcome. This reframing is documented in Chinese Baidu Tieba posts by 'ultimate truth_ONE' (2017-2018), which quote Bashar: 'The probability was about her winning the popular vote. She did win the popular vote. The Electoral College result was the other timeline.'

Sources

Baidu Tieba - Bashar Eclipse Session Clarification (Chinese, ultimate truth_ONE) 2017-09-23 · Third-party
Baidu Tieba - Bashar 2016 Election Clarification (Chinese) 2017-07-31 · Third-party
2016 U.S. Presidential Election Results 2016-11-08 · Third-party

Disclaimer — Bashar emphasizes that all predictions are probabilities, not certainties. Reality creation and parallel timelines mean individual and collective choices continuously shift outcomes. The 'accuracy' of any prediction must be understood within this framework.